Endogenizing Corporate Identities: The Next Step in Constructivist IR Theory
European Journal of International Relations 9(1): 5–35.
In recent years, constructivists in International Relations have been attempting to ‘seize the middle ground’ between positivist objectivism and postmodernist relativism. Yet, while useful in rendering the approach more palatable to mainstream researchers, these efforts risk leading to premature ontological closure. We therefore propose that constructivist research be extended to a ‘sociational’ research agenda. Based on Georg Simmel’s process theory of Vergesellschaftung, it joins contemporary constructivists on the epistemological middle ground while liberating itself from some of their ontological restrictions. The sociational perspective endogenizes the actors’ corporate identities as a way to trace ‘entity processes’ such as the creation and dissolution of actors as well as boundary change. Such an analytical shift makes it possible to imagine, and thus also to analyze, past, present and even future worlds constituted by co‐evolving social formations, such as nations, ethnic groups, supranational organizations and states. We show how sociational analysis complements and surpasses conventional explanations of cooperation and conflict as applied to the democratic peace and ethnic conflict.
DOI:
10.1177/1354066103009001156Cederman, Lars-Erik, and Christopher Daase. 2003. “Endogenizing Corporate Identities: The Next Step in Constructivist IR Theory.” European Journal of International Relations 9(1): 5–35.
@article{endogenizing-corporate-identities,
title = {Endogenizing Corporate Identities: The Next Step in Constructivist IR Theory},
author = {Cederman, Lars-Erik and Daase, Christopher},
journal = {European Journal of International Relations},
volume = {9},
number = {1},
pages = {5--35},
year = {2003},
publisher = {Sage Publications},
abstract = {In recent years, constructivists in International Relations have been attempting to `seize the middle ground' between positivist objectivism and postmodernist relativism. Yet, while useful in rendering the approach more palatable to mainstream researchers, these efforts risk leading to premature ontological closure. We therefore propose that constructivist research be extended to a `sociational' research agenda. Based on Georg Simmel's process theory of Vergesellschaftung, it joins contemporary constructivists on the epistemological middle ground while liberating itself from some of their ontological restrictions. The sociational perspective endogenizes the actors' corporate identities as a way to trace `entity processes' such as the creation and dissolution of actors as well as boundary change. Such an analytical shift makes it possible to imagine, and thus also to analyze, past, present and even future worlds constituted by co-evolving social formations, such as nations, ethnic groups, supranational organizations and states. We show how sociational analysis complements and surpasses conventional explanations of cooperation and conflict as applied to the democratic peace and ethnic conflict.},
doi = {10.1177/1354066103009001156},
url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1354066103009001156},
status = {personal}
}